Monday, May 16, 2011

Preity Zinta denies adoption report


Recently the report that made news about Preity Zinta’s being adopted by filmmaker Kamaal Amrohi's son Shandar Amrohi has been rubbishes by the bubbly actress.

Miffed with this news being spread about her, Zinta today announced online, "Noone has or ever will adopt me or sign me in a will. Things said in interviews & reported are far from facts as the proof is in the pudding!"


Preity Zinta's adoptive father and even told the media, "I am preparing to make a will, where I will give Preity everything that I have. Anyway, daughters have a right to everything". He also added that his biography will reveal the reason as why he has adopted Preity.

How’d Amanda Knox prosecutor get Google to shoot the messenger?

 Google slammed the door yesterday on Perugia Shock, Frank Sfarzo’s popular Amanda Knox blog, caving to pressure from prosecutor Giuliano Mignini. Convicted of abuse of office in 2009, Mignini is famous for harassing and wiretapping journalists who get too close to his investigations. The obsession we need to do our jobs he regards as madness.  He doesn’t appreciate Frank’s acid critiques of the global spectacle known as “The Amanda Show.”
Mignini has filed a lawsuit against Perugia Shock for  “defamation, carried out by means of a website,” reports the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). “The court order, which stemmed from Mignini’s claim, was issued on February 23 by Florentine Judge Paola Belsito. ”
Turns out Google got the word on March 25 via a fax from Florence’s lowly postal police. The giant U.S. company gave up Frank today–not with a bang or even a whimper. One would think Perugia Shock dealt with Italian national security, not a show trial.Many case observers thought Perugia Shock was bulletproof because a giant U.S. company hosted it but, no, Google required nothing more than an irate provincial prosecutor.

Does this look like freedom of expression? Couldn’t Google wait for an investigation or, like, a trial? Why is a lion pretending to be a lamb?

Smart, enigmatic, fond of hand-rolled cigarettes, Frank is the only reporter to cover every single hearing, the one Italian who writes in English for a global audience. Still, he lives in a land where the press slipped into  “partly free” in 2009, according to Freedom House.

His life in Perugia is a horror tale. As CPJ has documented, the price he’s paid for covering the Knox case ranges from being kicked by a cop in the courthouse to a brutal beating in October  by five officers, after which he spent a night in jail. They’ve now charged him with assault. So he faces two court actions and is looking at big fines and even jail time. In short: his treatment parallels the jailing of Mario Spezi, co-author of the Monster of Florence, who also ran afoul of Mignini.

When I spoke to Frank about Google’s action, he said he wasn’t sure how he’d defamed the prosecutor.“What did you say to anger Mignini?” I asked.“The truth!” “Google did it and did not tell me why, but that it was a judge order. I learned by email,” he’d told West Seattle Herald by phone from Perugia yesterday. “The lawsuit went to the court in Florence, and the judge in Florence made a decree of seizure of the blog.”

In an open letter to the president of Italy, prestigious CPJ described his beating as well as the petty harassment that cops practice against him in the courtroom (which I’ve witnessed first hand). Today, CPJ called on authorities to “drop the trumped-up defamation lawsuit against Perugia Shock.”

Several weeks ago, Google lost a defamation case in Italy, sparked by its own use of ”autocomplete suggestions” in search. Before that, three Google executives were convicted of invasion of privacy over a YouTube video that showed  the bullying of a child with Down’s Syndrome.

Frank Sfarzo appears often in Murder In Italy, my Amanda Knox book. But I’ll let him speak for himself. Here’s his final blog. And, yes, I do have a call into Google. I’ll update when I get more information.


THOSE STRANGE COINCIDENCES
Stefano Conti and Carla Vecchiotti, the independent experts who were supposed to deliver their study on knife and bra clasp to the court next May 9, just asked for a postponement. It seems that their attention is now towards a possible contamination occurred outside the test. They are right because, as we know, that DNA doesn’t fit any logic, it simply can’t be there. Non-blood DNA on the blade requires another explanation than the knife being the murder weapon. And even for the bra clasp, as we shall see, there are some problems…

THE LAST FAMOUS WORDS 
‘Patrick killed Meredith’
‘No, Amanda killed Meredith’
‘They called the 112 after the postal police arrived’
‘We surprised them while doing laundry’
‘There was glass on the clothes’
‘Amanda thrown her sweatshirt’
‘There’s a bleach receipt’
‘There was a strong bleach smell’
‘Raffaele brought his bloody shirt to the laundry’
‘The shoe-print is Raffaele’s’
‘The shoe-print on the pillowcase is Amanda’s’
‘We had the intuition that the knife was the murder weapon’
‘Raffaele was cutting girls in Puglia’
‘You are HIV positive, good night’
‘Amanda was a drug addict and was having sex with drug dealers’
…


 Impressive: not even one right thing. Not to mention what they are forced to admit in order to justify themselves:
‘Amanda said Patrick was the killer and yes, we believed her’ (!)
‘We didn’t know who Patrick was, so we had not even studied the phone printouts’(!)
’Yes, we didn’t record the interrogations’(!)
‘Yes, we burned 4 computers (!) And we didn’t pay damages’(not yet)
‘Yes, we weren’t able not even to find Nara who lives right there’(!)
‘Yes, we knew there weren’t buses that night and we didn’t say anything, we forgot’(!)
‘Yes, we turned the house upside-down while the scientific police still hadn’t finished their job’(!)
‘Yes, we weren’t able to find the bra clasp during three inspections. (!) The biologists can do our own job better than us: they came from Rome and found it immediately’ (!)
….
Mignini didn’t arrest these people. Mignini and Manuela Comodi defend these people.
But these people don’t defend Mignini and Comodi: they said ‘Goodbye, your problem now!’

Natalee Holloway Joran van der Sloot Case Impacted by New Treaty


Tonight at 9:00 pm ET, Lifetime premieres its latest movie about the Natalee Holloway story called JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY. I had the opportunity to watch the movie in advance and I am still on the fence as to whether I liked it or not.

First, the movie is entirely too long. Although it clocks in at the usual two hours (with commercials), after the first twenty minutes or so, I began to think it was dragging. That is never good. Second, the story tells us everything we already know. This was somewhat of a problem with Lifetime’s first movie about Natalee Holloway, but at least the writers opted to provide some alternate theories as to what could have occurred. This time everything is exactly as it played out in the media with little room for creative story lines and actually no justice at all for Natalee.

Justice for Natalee Holloway picks up four years after Natalee Holloway’s disappearance and explores just how much this has affected and changed Beth Twitty, Natalee’s mother. The movie brings back Tracy Pollan as Beth Twitty and Grant Show as George “Jug” Twitty, familiar faces that automatically bring the viewer right back into the story. Unfortunately, despite newer events, nothing much has changed. Despite the title, there is still no justice for Natalee and still no answers for Beth. Perhaps the movie felt like it was dragging so much because it was so painful to watch Beth continue to find some hope only to have it squashed in the next instance. Then when she is finally able to somewhat move on, the fifth anniversary happens and she again abandons herself to revert right back to the greiving, angry mother again. That is not to say she has no right or that her feelings are inappropriate. To the contary, that is to be expected, however, it is still painful to watch.

The movie does a good job of showing contrasting views of one person living their life at the same time as another. For example, there will be dual shots of Joran getting off a plan at the same time Beth gets off a plane, each on entirely different missions. I found that to be the most interesting part, to see how events coincided with each other. Also, although, I have followed this story all along, with each passing year, less is said about subsequent events. The movie, however, showed exactly how everything happened including Joran Van der Sloot’s multiple offers to reveal what happened to Natalee, but only for money, and never truthful. I was also unaware of what happened between Beth and Jug.

The final say? If you are someone that has been invested in this story from the start, you might want to tune in as a follow up to the last major telling of the story. However, having said that, you will also know exactly what happens. If you are like me and that doesn’t really matter, then tune in to Justice for Natalee Holloway tonight at 9 pm ET on Lifetime. For those of you that do not know what happened since Beth Twitty left Aruba five years ago, it is worth the viewing to catch you up.

What I would really like to know is what you thought of the Justice for Natalee Holloway movie. After you watch it, come back here and tell me what you thought. Was it a good follow up movie? Did it tie up loose ends? Will there ever truly be justice for Natalee and peace for Beth? Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Osama Bin Laden Dead | Obama Announced, Osama Bin Laden Dead


Osama Bin Laden is dead, President Obama announced Sunday night, in a televised address to the nation. His death was the result of a U.S. operation launched today in Abbottabad, Pakistan, against a compound where bin Laden was believed to be hiding, according to U.S. intelligence. After a firefight, a small team of American forces killed bin Laden and took possession of his body, the president said.
“Tonight I can report to the American people and the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden,” Obama said during brief remarks at the White House.
“Justice has been done,” he said, in comments that marked a formal end of the manhunt for the most visible and emotionally-charged symbol of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The president said U.S. intelligence operatives received a tip in August on bin Laden’s whereabouts, which ultimately led to Sunday’s attack. Obama said he determined last week that the U.S. had enough reliable information to take action; by Sunday morning, he had authorized “a small team of Americans” to conduct an operation targeting bin Laden.
“After a fire fight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body,” the president said. “No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties.”
Obama said the 9/11 attacks that bin Laden and his lieutenants orchestrated nearly 10 years ago remain “the worst attack on the American people in our history” and said the images of the crumbling Twin Towers “are seared into our national memory.”
The president emphasized that Americans “did not choose this fight” against al Qaeda, but rather, “it came to our shores.” He praised U.S. military and intelligence professionals for working “tirelessly to achieve this outcome.” To the families of 9/11 victims, he noted that the U.S. has “never forgotten your loss.”
“Tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11,” Obama said. “I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people.”
Both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had targeted bin Laden during their presidencies, and both had failed to either capture him or kill him. The failure to snare bin Laden weighed most heavily, perhaps, on the Bush Administration, which occupied the White House during the 9/11 attacks, and the al Qaeda leader’s killing falls exactly eight years to the day when Bush famously declared “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq.


Bush said in a statement that Obama called him Sunday night to inform him of “the momentous achievement” of bin Laden’s death.
“I congratulated him and the men and women of our military and intelligence communities who devoted their lives to this mission. They have our everlasting gratitude,” Bush said. “The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.”
Clinton, who was president when the first World Trade Center bombing occurred in 1993, issued a statement calling bin Laden’s death “a profoundly important moment not just for the families of those who lost their lives on 9/11 and in al-Qaida’s other attacks but for people all over the world who want to build a common future of peace, freedom, and cooperation for our children.”
In a conference call with reporters just after President Obama spoke, senior administration officials provided a detailed sketch of how the intelligence on bin Laden’s whereabouts was gathered.
Intelligence officials had been conducting lengthy reconnaissance work prior to receiving their key tip in August. According to senior administration officials, suspected terrorists in custody since 9/11 -- including the attack’s mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- identified a courier who had a close relationship with bin Laden.
“This man was one of the few al Qaeda couriers trusted by bin Laden,” one senior administration official said. “They indicated he might be living with and protecting bin Laden. But for years we were unable to identify his true name or his location. Four years ago we uncovered his identity… About two years ago, after months of persistent effort, we identified areas of Pakistan where the courier and his brother operated. Still, we were unable to pinpoint exactly where they lived due to extensive operational security on their part. The fact that they were being so careful reinforced our belief that we were on the right track.”


When the intelligence community finally pinpointed the courier’s location, they were “shocked by what we saw,” said this official.

The neighborhood in Abbottabad was “relatively affluent with lots of retired military,” this official continued, and was insulated from urban areas or places susceptible to natural disaster and terrorist attacks. The home was “roughly eight times larger than the other homes in the area,” and it was surrounded by 12-to-18-foot-high walls, topped with barbed wire. It had two security gates and a value of roughly $1 million, although it lacked telephone and Internet connections.

An even more telling clue for intelligence operatives: The occupants of the house were burning their trash rather than putting it out for collection. 



One senior administration official suggested bin Laden had been staying at the compound for at least six months without moving. Bin Laden was known to have regularly shifted locations to evade capture, so it’s unusual that he chose to stay in on spot for such an extended period.

More recently, the Obama administration had reduced the number of drone strikes in the area -- while ramping up surveillance -- in an effort to give the al Qaeda leader a heightened sense of safety in his home.

Prior to the operation, Obama convened nine meetings with his national security team to review intelligence. According to a White House aide, “Principals met formally an additional five times themselves and their deputies met seven times.”

The president made the decision to undertake the operation at 8:20 a.m. on April 29th in the White House’s Diplomatic Room before he left to survey tornado damage in Alabama. Tom Donilon, his National Security Advisor, prepared the formal orders and convened the principals at 3 p.m. that same day to complete the planning.

The next day, without giving off a hint of the weighty operation being planned, Obama prepared for and delivered his address at the annual White House Correspondent's Association dinner. The next morning he played nine holes of golf.

Final preparations were made on Sunday. At 2 p.m., the president met with top advisers for an hour and half, at which point he returned to the Situation Room for an additional briefing. Twenty minutes after that, he learned that bin Laden had been “tentatively identified.” By 7 p.m. he was told it was highly probable that bin Laden was at the compound. By 8:30 p.m., he received an additional briefing. He signed off on the attack after that.

No other intelligence operatives in other countries were told of the attack before it occurred -- including Pakistani operatives -- according to administration officials. Vice President Joseph Biden informed congressional leadership of the attack shortly before it took place, aides on the Hill told the Huffington Post.
Al Qaeda, Obama, Osama Bin Laden, Bin Laden Dead, Osama, Osama Bin Laden Dead, Osama Dead, World News,


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...